Not to Praise Them

Regimes that harbour illusions of permanent grandeur
are never more brutal and gauche than when
the earth begins to slip from under their feet
Statements that contradict the swagger and begin to register some hometruths. The top-secret assessment of the Marines’ Chief of Intelligence runs thus:
"The prospects for securing that country’s western Anbar province are dim and (that) there is almost nothing the U.S. military can do to improve the political and social situation there”
Remember the goal of victory in Iraq? Savour this: “U.S. officials acknowledge their main goal in Iraq now is to prevent it from turning into a place run by fundamentalists who export terrorism to the region”
To cut a long story short, these are the facts: America has not only lost the war in Iraq but achieved the magnificent result of anointing Iran as its political guru and guardian! The neocon imperialists do not seem to succeed even in the alternate and nefarious purpose of fragmenting Iraq into three convenient regions.
As to oil, for five years now, the famed fields in Iraq fail to produce quantities that match even the worst years of the Saddam era; nor is it likely that anytime soon, the new, or still newer government in Iraq will make the neocon guzzlers lords of Iraqi oil fields. So much for Cheney and Halliburton.
Iraqis are now beginning to say openly that the Saddam-led Baathist dispensation was a better option.
Secondly, the Israeli invasion of Lebanon has had the further magnificent consequence of placing Hezbollah on a deservedly incontestable pedestal, whereby all Lebanese, including the Christians and the Druize swear by it.
That consequence in turn reestablishes Syria in a way that had seemed out of reckoning only months ago, in addition to exposing Israel as a floundering, second-rate state, without a friend in the world (excepting the United States and the Hindutva fascists in India).
Nearer home, as the municipal government of Hamid Karzai struggles to keep control of Kabul, the vaunted forces of the Nato and the U.S. military together are askance everyday at the resurgence of the Taliban who, don’t you know, were thought to be dead and buried as a result of the famous invasion of Afghanistan.
Alongwith that, the Al Qaeda machine seems able gleefully to produce one video message after another as the days go by, and Mushrraf- the- macho is constrained actually to sign an agreement with the Taliban in North Waziristan to the effect that no further military operations will be conducted in the region!
His domestic compulsions also force him now to disclose the unlovely fact that his close allies in the “war on terror’’, namely, the Bushies had in so many words threatened to bomb Pakistan back into the stone age unless she cooperated in the said war!
In consequence, this strategic bulwark against “terrorism” is being dubbed a disgraceful “coward” by the Pakistani media. How much longer Pakistan remains a unified nation-state begins to be a serious question.
Thus, what of the formidable “international alliance” in the “war on terror”?
With Blair now very publicly lame, and Italy recalling what forces it has in Iraq, now that the socialist, Romano Prodi, rules the roost there, the alliance comprises Bush and his worst hallucinations.
Think that even the so-loyal South Koreans pick up the courage to demand the withdrawal of American troops from their soil, and to express their longing for reunification with their ethnic brothers in the North.
Same for East Asia generally, barring the white exception of the Howard regime in Australia, and some undemocratic city-state regimes (Singapore, Phillipines etc.,)
As to the two “backyards,” Latin America and the erstwhile Baltic and Central Asian components of the then Soviet Union, wiser counsels prevail.
The Latin countries spawn anti-U.S regimes through the ballot box, and on this side of the Atlantic, even Ukraine is lost.
Indeed, so rapidly does the political balance of opinion internationally suffer alteration that Chavez actually draws open and zestful applause as he denominates Bush the “devil” in his speech to the U.N. General assembly.
And Ahmedinejad actually gets the better of the international press core in New York, forcefully and playfully establishing the reality that many of the American reporters may actually neither be as free or as smart as they perhaps erroneously believe themselves to be.
Then there's the 'war on terror'
Far from the bogus thesis that the major contradiction of the day is between an “enlightened” western world and a “jihadi” Islam, the crude fact remains that the rapacious partisanship displayed by the American and the British in regard to West Asian and Middle-Eastern history of recent times is almost singly responsible for the turmoil in evidence, not to speak of Afghanistan and Pakistan.If the Indian Prime Minister has absorbed that reality the consequences both internationally and at home in India can only be positive.
Is it possible that it is precisely inorder to keep the construction of “Islamofascism” a going concern that America and the rest of the Western world desist from helping resolve the Palestine issue?
Do they perhaps realize that once that matter is brought to a just close, the “Islamofascism” imaginary might just collapse, and encourage the view that solutions can be found to other historical inequities?
What then might become of the Imperialist project of “full spectrum dominance” over the fruits of the earth?
As world-wide political consolidation against American imperialism acquires teeth, bolstered, it must be said, by those brave Americans who continue to fight the good fight on behalf of the ideals of the Philadelphia declaration and the American Constitution, new and sanguine state-level alignments can be expected to materialize.
In that new international order, Russia, China, India, and Latin America together, along with a renovated Middle-East, including perhaps even a democratized Pakistan—unless events catch up with it in catastrophic ways-- able to voice the strong anti-imperialist convictions that its very evolved civil society bear even now, can show the way out of the madness to which the neocon “vision” of a desired Armageddon has subjected the world.
A recast America by then, hopefully, can become a partner in rebuilding the world in just and enlightened ways. In that regard, it must be everyone’s hope that the coming November elections there to the House and the Senate will make a clear enough departure.
Centuries ago, the wise bard of Avon wrote that magnificent line: “ the abuse of greatness is when it disjoins remorse from power”(Julius Caesar).
The agenda for world leaders now is to remarry remorse and power—a telos that even the Pope needs rather to mull over—something he could do were he to bring himself to look the many unlovely aspects of the history of Christianity in the eye.
The Pontiff could begin by honestly asking the question as to why the first Crusade was launched in the first instance, and what the record of the Christian sword has since then been with regard to other faiths and nations.
Just as the state and its institutions in America need to return to their foundational inspirations, may be the Church at the Vatican and Christianity generally would do well to return to the gentle, non-discriminatory humanism of Jesus. There was a man.
Badri Raina/ZNet