|
|
Hillary Clinton Is a Closet Socialist [Satire]
by
max blunt
at 02:20PM (CET) on January 2, 2008 | Permanent Link
| Cosmos
Mesmerized audiences fall for her talk
about socialized medicine, overtaxing the rich,
making the oil companies spend their profits,
her plans for the redistribution of wealth,
her socialist reform of education
and ultimately, making everybody equal Hillary Clinton is a professed socialist
and she has promised to move our nation
in that direction with the arrogant assumption
that Americans will vote for her for that reason
That is the scariest notion that
has been espoused in any election in my memory
We cannot afford to squander our resources
pitting the productive wage earners against those
who think government can divert
unearned wealth into their pockets
Do not impose socialism on my grandkids
Do not put that woman in a position to further
her personal need for power
at the cost of freedom for my familyThe former members of the Soviet Politburo, Fidel Castro, Chinese communists, Hugo Chavez and other heads of communist regimes applaud themselves when giving a speech. They all join their audiences in this gesture of self approval.
Hillary Clinton does the same thing and that tells me a lot about this liberal socialist (but millionaire) Democrat candidate.
Mesmerized audiences fall for her when she talks about socialized medicine, overtaxing the rich, making the oil companies spend their profits in her own plans for the redistribution of wealth, her socialist reform of education and ultimately, making everybody equal, etc.
It is indeed frightening. She exploits the Hollywood mentality of many sectors of our society that all must end like a fairy tale. We will all have to depend on government programs to be happy ever after.
These are just plain Marxist doctrines that curtail individual effort and which never worked in the Soviet Union, or China. That nation is moving toward capitalism, and its economy is booming.
But those doctrines play very well in the minds of some people whose lives are not on par with the rich or the upper middle class.
The liberal Democrats, supported by the liberal press, know how to play the class envy card very well in order to gain power.
Hillary's admiration for some Soviet Marxist communist writers and philosophers that have influenced her throughout her life is indicative of what is coming to this country if she is elected. She will indeed plant the seeds of worse things to come.
If women will vote for her just because she is a woman, and the liberal press elevates her candidacy because of its Hollywoodesque socialist view in which they perceive the poor, minorities, and illegal immigrants all as "victims", it says a lot about our collective ignorance.
There certainly will be a price to pay some day for this ignorance. It took 74 years and millions of victims in the Soviet Union who paid with their lives through dreadful social purges and dislocated government programs. Do we really want to start that here now?
And for those who say "it couldn't happen here," I say it already is happening here.
When deciding whether or not to vote for Hillary Clinton next November, one should be mindful of how Christmas might change with a socialist, feminist, Mexi-nazi in the White House.
Such changes might include the following:
* Affirmative action would be required at the North Pole, including quotas for hiring black, Hispanic, Asian, Native American, gay and lesbian, transexual, and handicapped elves.
* There would be a zero tolerance policy for hiring straight, Caucasian, Christian applicants, although there would be active
" outreach programs" for illegal aliens accused of DUIs and ax-savvy Jihadists.
* An Elves' "Bill of Rights" would mandate minimum wage and free health insurance for Elves with at least 90 days of continuos service and current in payment of their monthly Elves Union dues.
* Santa would be prohibited from requiring elves to speak English while on the job. All gifts left for illegal aliens would include a hand-written note from Santa, in Spanish.
* To demonstrate the dangers of global warming, Santa would be required to make his global journey in the nude, excepting his stocking cap which he could relocate to his lap in case of an unexpected, and at his age unlikely, emergency.
* In the interest of animal rights, environmentalism, and pandering to Hispanic voters, Santa's reindeer would be replaced by illegal aliens using Hillary-copters left over from the Iowa campaign to pull Santa's sleigh across the night sky.
* The jolly old bird would be required to submit an Equitable Distribution Plan to demonstrate how he would pinch expensive gifts from "rich" families and deposit same to the poor, near poor, and other struggling constituencies of the Democrat party.
* Registered Republicans and families earning more than $200,000 would automatically be designated as "naughty" for tax purposes, and to help Santa plan his Christmas Eve gig.
* Santa would be required to take possession of all cookies and other sugary treats left out for him, and to leave a Thank You note advising the child giver of the health hazards of hi-fat, hi-cab, hi-taste junk foods.
* On the way back to the North Pole, Santa would unload all those confiscated goodies at DNC headquarters in Washington, D.C., from where they would be auctioned during a PBS broadcast of "Exposing Christmas As a Pagan Rip Off and Christian Cash Cow," with proceeds going directly to the "Re-elect Hillary in 2012" fund.
Let the forewarned be wary of the aforementioned: With Hillary Clinton as president, Christmas would cease to exist!
A Hillary Clinton presidency with a powerful Democrat Congress can do enough damage to move America closer to Socialism while the average citizen sleeps with CNN [Clinton News Network] blasting in the background.
Hillary Clinton is frothing at the mouth thinking how she could transform government into a universal playground for Socialism.
It’s not just Hillary Clinton who would like a “Socialist Society” for America, Chris Dodd and have supported Chávez in the past while hard Left Liberals quietly watch and yearn for the power a Chávez style takeover would provide them for years to come.
Barack Hussein Obama would have the audacity to form his own style of Socialistic “Hope” fora welfare state in America.
John Edwards would transform his “Two-America’s” into a government controlled state where the “poor” would live off the “rich” until the “rich” would only reside within the government.
Democrats and Liberal Republicans stay in power by appeasing the poor and middle-class making them believe hope is gone and only government can uplift people into a better life.
Hillary Clinton wants to mute free speech and control questions asked of her. Ms. Clinton refuses to make public millions of documents while she served as “co-President” with husband Bill who was pushed to the center by a Republican Congress.
A Hillary Clinton presidency with a Liberal Congress will push America to the far left and set the stage for a return to FDR Socialism.
Socialism has never worked in the history of modern civilization. The defunct USSR is a recent victim of that experiment. Socialism fails to account for the fundamental nature of productive human beings to profit from their efforts and their skills.
Hillary Clinton is a professed socialist and she has promised to move our nation in that direction with the arrogant assumption that Americans will vote for her for that reason.
That is the scariest notion that has been espoused in any election in my memory.
We cannot afford to squander our resources pitting the productive wage earners against those who think government can divert unearned wealth into their pockets.
We have a large mass of religious fanatics out there whose intent is to kill non-Muslims. We need our productive people and we need them to focus on closing our borders to those who mean to harm us.
Dump the self-centered parasites from the Congress and elect people who recognize the need for unity among Americans.
Do not impose socialism on my grandkids. Do not put that woman in a position to further her personal need for power at the cost of freedom for my family. Vote with your brains!
Unlike most of his under-educated peers in the media, Goldberg rejects the historically ignorant view still dominant in American pop culture that perceives Fascism and National Socialism as right-wing political phenomena.
Goldberg correctly identifies both revolutionary ideologies as being inherently of the political left; more importantly, he provides substantial documentary evidence proving his case beyond any rational doubt.
And in doing so, he exposes six decades of intellectual fraud committed by American academics, 60 years of university professors averting their eyes from the historical realities and teaching the literal Stalinist line to multiple generations of college students.
This is a book that not only needed to be written; it is one that is long overdue.
At 496 pages, "Liberal Fascism" is also a long march. Nor is it always an easy one, since Goldberg takes what is perhaps best described as a biographical approach to the subject rather than a methodical one; the case is made effectively, but not efficiently or orderly.
However, the chaotic structure of the book is at least partially due to the historically fluid nature of fascism itself.
As Goldberg notes, the Italian fascists were eminently pragmatic political animals, led as they were by an audacious, highly intelligent man of outstanding political gifts who was about as concerned with ideological purity as William Jefferson Clinton.
It is somewhat disappointing to discover that this structural synchronicity is not a brilliant literary metaphor, but merely a fortuitous coincidence.
While it will be very difficult for even the most stubborn leftist to take serious issue with Goldberg's proper placing of historical fascism on the political spectrum, it is the controversial connection he draws between European fascism and American progressivism, which he references as the source of Hillary Clinton's "politics of meaning."
Trackbacks
TrackBack URL:
http://www.radicalleft.net/blog/_trackback/3439122
No trackbacks found.
|
|