Obama is a power-respectful, bourgeois,

non-threatening “good” black

Whites are calmed by the cool,

underplayed blackness and ponderous,

quasi-academic tone of the half-white,

Harvard-educated Obama

He doesn’t shout, chant, holler or drawl

The technically biracial Obama’s campaign

and persona are perfectly calibrated for

this era of victim-blaming neoliberal racism

He allows whites to assuage their racial guilt

and feel non-racist by liking and perhaps

even voting for him while signaling that

he won’t do anything to tackle and redress

the steep racial disparities and systemic

racial oppression that continue to

deeply scar American life and institutions

“What . . . me and my country racist?

You can’t be serious: we’re thinking seriously

about voting for a black man as president

My wife and son just love Oprah and Jamie Fox”

The "Good" Black[Original]

The remarkable success of power-respectful, bourgeois, non-threatening “good” blacks like Barack Obama, Oprah Winfrey and Colin Powell helps white Americans believe that blacks have only themselves to blame on the whole for black America’s persistently separate and unequal status in the U.S.

For many whites, loving national media stars like Oprah and Barack is the nice reverse side of hating inner-city Darnell and Lakisha.

The sophisticated and opportunistic Obama knows this very well.

He’s not going to complicate his comfortable funding relationships with the likes of Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Henry Crown and Co. and General Dynamics et al by substantively criticizing empire and/or class inequality at home and abroad.

In a similarly calculating and power-seeking vein, he’s not about to undermine his favorable post-Civil Rights situation with the white electoral majority by making strong public reference to the persistently powerful and pervasive role of anti-black racism in American life.

He’s going to try to ride white America’s self-serving racial confusion and denial as far as he can — all the way, he hopes, to the White House.

“HE’S NOT ALL THAT BLACK”

Part of Obama’s appeal to white America has to do with the widespread Caucasian sense that Obama “isn’t all that black.”

Many whites who roll their eyes at the mention of the names of Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton — former presidential candidates who behave in ways that many whites find too African-American — are calmed by the cool, underplayed blackness and ponderous, quasi-academic tone of the half-white, Harvard-educated Obama. Obama doesn’t shout, chant, holler or drawl.

He doesn’t rail against injustice, bring the parishioners to their feet and threaten delicate white suburban and middle-class sensibilities. He stays away from catchy slogans (like Jackson’s “Keep Hope Alive”) and from emotive “truth”-speaking confrontations with power.

To use Joe Biden’s revealing terminology, Obama strikes many whites as “clean” and “articulate” — something different from their unfortunately persistent image of blacks as dirty, dangerous, irrational and unintelligible.

Obama has no moral or political obligation to shed his biracial identity, “multicultural” background and elite, private school education to “act [more classically and stereotypically] black.”

But whites’ racial attitudes are less progressive than might be assumed when their willingness to embrace a black candidate is conditioned by their requirement that his or her “blackness” be qualified.

Obama: Ruling-Class Lackey

For someone who marches across Iowa

and New Hampshire telling working-class

and middle-class Americans to “get fired up”

and “stand up” for democracy (and for him),

Obama sure likes to spend a lot of time

groveling before the white ruling elite

Maybe it’s because Barack Obama and his handlers

are sensitive to the need to reassure ruling forces

that the “first black United States president”

will not challenge existing hierarchies

Maybe it’s because he’s bought and paid for by big money

Or maybe it’s because he believes in his

“deeply conservative” heart that good Americans

show deep respect for their socioeconomic masters

Whatever the explanation, I’ve never seen

an avowedly “progressive” political candidate

more eager than Obama to display his deep willingness

to obsequiously kiss the ring

of dominant political and economic authority

Obama Is Deeply Conservative [Original]

It is nauseating to see Obama’s disturbing statements of fawning respect for the predominantly white capitalist economic elite – the top 1 percent that owns more than a third of U.S. wealth and a probably higher percentage of its politicians, policymakers, and opinion-makers.

Given his dependence on super-rich “election investors” to run a viable presidential campaign under the plutocratic rules of the United States’ self-negating “market democracy”, it’s not surprising that he would wish to avoid offending the nation’s leading corporate power-brokers.

But Obama goes beyond the call of class-deferential duty when he praises the arch-plutocratic Ronald Reagan for embodying “American’s longing for order” and when he pens the following sickening paean to aristocratic rule in The Audacity of Hope:

“The Founders recognized that there were seeds of anarchy in the idea of individual freedom, an intoxicating danger in the idea of equality, for if everybody is truly free, without the constraints of birth or rank and an inherited social order…how can we ever hope to form a society that coheres?”

How’s that for commitment to the democratic and egalitarian ideals to which the United States so often lays special claim?

“OUR [GREAT] FREE MARKET SYSTEM”

Equally appalling is Obama’s eagerness to praise the glories of the capitalist system that produces grotesque fortunes at the top of America’s “inherited social order” while tens of millions of Americans go without adequate food, clothing, shelter, and health insurance.

One key question addressed in The Audacity of Hope comes straight out of the neoconservative world view Obama was so good at accommodating at Harvard Law: what makes the United States so “exceptionally” wonderful?

Obama finds part of the answer to this nationally narcissistic query in the wise and benevolent leadership of the nation’s great white Founders and subsequent supposedly sensible leaders like Harry “Hiroshima” Truman and JFK.

But Obama roots the excellence and eminence of America in something deeper than the magnificence of its political elite.

He also grounds the United States’ supposed distinctive impressiveness in its “free market” capitalist system and “business culture.”

The United States overclass should be gratified by Obama’s paean to the United States’ “free-market” system of (in reality state- and corporate-) capitalism.